Intel Sparkle Arc B580 OC overview: Top-of-the-line price range 1440p playing cards we have seen
A refreshing possibility for 1440p gaming
Up to date: Dec 20, 2024 1:50 pm
WePC is reader-supported. While you purchase by hyperlinks on our web site, we could earn an affiliate fee. Costs topic to alter. Be taught extra
The Intel Arc B580 is the newest addition to Intel’s increasing Arc lineup. It guarantees mid-tier efficiency for avid gamers and creators alike. Constructed on Intel’s Xe2 structure, the B580 goals to supply a aggressive possibility within the crowded $300 GPU market. Positioned to compete instantly with AMD’s RX 7600 and Nvidia’s RTX 4060, the B580 has lots using on its shoulders as Intel continues to carve out its place as among the finest GPUs within the price range class. And we are able to confidently say this launch has been much better than Alchemist.
This overview examines the Intel Arc B580’s design, gaming and artificial benchmark efficiency, and total worth for cash. We hope it’s going to assist you to resolve if that is the GPU improve you’ve been ready for—if you will discover one in inventory.
Specs
- Core clock pace: 2670 MHz – 2670 MHz (enhance)
- Shading items: 2560
- Reminiscence: 12 GB
- Dimensions: 222 x 101mm, 2.2slot
- PSU required: 450 W
- TBP: 190 W
- Core clock pace: 2670 MHz – 2670 MHz (enhance)
- Shading items: 2560
- Reminiscence: 12 GB
- Dimensions: 222 x 101mm, 2.2slot
- PSU required: 450 W
- TBP: 190 W
- Reminiscence clock: 2375 MHz
- Reminiscence bus: 192 bit
- Card bus: PCIe 4.0 x8
- Output: 1x HDMI 2.1a 3x DisplayPort 2.1
- Energy connectors: 1x 8-pin
Present extra
What We Suppose
The Intel Arc B580 is without doubt one of the finest mid-range 1440p playing cards we’ve got examined, Intel have come a good distance since Alchemist and they’re right here to inject some worth into the extra price range finish of the dimensions. We noticed some unbelievable efficiency in 1440p, and a few vital triumphs over the RTX 4060 normally. We extremely suggest this card if you will discover it near the MSRP of $249. (AIB costs will range)
Causes to Purchase
- Sturdy efficiency in 1440p
- Superb ray tracing efficiency even in comparison with the 4060
- New structure improves effectivity
- Three fan design retains excessive temps at bay
Causes to Keep away from
- The 50 sequence will doubtless supersede this card
- Availability is skinny (as of the time of writing)
Full Specs
2670 MHz – 2670 MHz (enhance)
2670 MHz – 2670 MHz (enhance)
1x HDMI 2.1a 3x DisplayPort 2.1
As you’ll be able to see, Intel has been onerous at work bettering the B sequence to be greater and higher than the A sequence might ever hope. It’s a welcome proven fact that Intel is pushing to offer folks on the extra price range finish of the dimensions extra choices. We predict it’s an space of the market that hasn’t acquired some love for some time. AMD talked about that it will additionally cease competing on the high finish of the market and focus extra on the mid-to-budget finish. Leaving Nvidia to run a mock.
Design and High quality
The Intel Arc B580 Sparkle Titan is the GPU we’ve got for testing; it’s a three-fan card painted in a stunning muted blue with pale gray followers. The inner heatsink spans the cardboard’s complete width, permitting loads of floor space to maintain itself cool. As a result of this GPU isn’t an absolute monster, it solely takes up two enlargement slots in your case, which means you’ll be able to comfortably match the Sparkle Titan right into a smaller form-factor case.
Energy comes within the type of a single 8-pin fan connector across the center of the GPU, which is well accessible for these constructing in tight areas. Nevertheless, it does look a large number for those who don’t handle the cable appropriately. Whereas powered on, there’s no discernable coil whine in any respect, as is current with among the extra highly effective AMD playing cards (the very loud 7900 XT).
How We Examined the Intel Arc B580
As with all our GPU evaluations, the Intel Arc B580 underwent rigorous testing in real-world gaming situations and artificial benchmarks.
Following our ‘how we take a look at’ methodology, we in contrast the Arc B580 to its primary opponents, specializing in key metrics like common FPS, 99th percentile efficiency, and energy effectivity throughout a number of resolutions. We even included some artificial benchmarks to see how the B580 carried out computationally. Listed below are our outcomes:
Efficiency
Right here at WePC, we preserve testing as pretty as doable, even throughout platforms and generations. That’s why guaranteeing all testing environments are as shut as doable is vital. This will likely contain utilizing the identical pace reminiscence kits, motherboards with related specs, and CPUs that gained’t restrict the efficiency of the GPU (bottleneck). Listed below are the parts that we selected to check the Arc B580.
| Element | Title |
|---|---|
| Motherboard | ASUS ProArt X670E-CREATOR WIFI |
| CPU | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
| Reminiscence | Corsair Dominator Titanium RGB (64GB, 6600MT/s, CL32) |
| CPU cooler | ROG RYUJIN III 360 |
| PSU | ASUS ROG Thor 1000W |
| Case | Coolermaster Grasp Body |
Outlining parts is vital because it additionally offers us an thought of how properly a sure GPU performs and what you may anticipate from the same system at house. On the flip facet, for those who don’t get the identical numbers we do with this GPU, it’s doubtless the distinction in {hardware}.
Gaming benchmarks
Earlier
Subsequent
When evaluating the Intel Arc B580 and Nvidia RTX 4060 throughout varied video games and benchmarks, we see a battle the place every GPU excels in numerous areas. At 1080p, the RTX 4060 usually maintains a efficiency benefit in titles like CS2; as an example, in CS2, the RTX 4060 delivers a mean FPS of 188, in comparison with the Arc B580’s 167.
Nevertheless, the Arc B580 flips it round in video games like Doom Everlasting (222 FPS) and SOTTR (137 FPS), constantly posting greater common and percentile FPS values – although it’s fairly shut in SOTTR. This pattern means that Arc B580’s optimization could favour particular engines and workloads, significantly these extra VRAM-intensive.
At 1440p, the efficiency hole widens additional. Whereas the Arc B580 holds a slight edge in additional demanding situations like SOTTR (98 FPS vs the RTX 4060’s 84), the RTX 4060 struggles in memory-intensive conditions. Cyberpunk 2077 exhibits noticeable limitations on account of its decrease VRAM capability. This can be a recurring theme at greater resolutions, the place the Arc B580’s 12GB VRAM permits smoother efficiency, particularly in titles with excessive texture calls for or ray tracing workloads.
In ray tracing, the outcomes are a combined bag. At 1080p with RT enabled, the Arc B580 leads considerably in titles like Doom Everlasting, reaching 162 FPS in comparison with the RTX 4060’s 125 FPS. Nevertheless, because the decision scales to 1440p and 4K, each GPUs wrestle with intensive RT workloads, although the Arc B580’s bigger VRAM capability typically permits it to keep up higher body charges.
The RTX 4060 slows down in 1440p and 4K RT situations, typically failing them utterly (as we see in Doom Everlasting), steadily operating out of reminiscence and dropping frames, significantly in Cyberpunk 2077 and SOTTR. Nevertheless, it needs to be talked about that these GPUs are usually not meant to play video games in 4k.
Artificial benchmarks
Earlier
Subsequent
Artificial benchmarks additional spotlight the strengths and weaknesses. The B580 scores considerably greater in all 3Dmark duties, indicating superior architectural effectivity for conventional rasterized efficiency (normally). Video encoding workloads, similar to H.265 encoding in Handbrake, additionally go to the Arc, because it simply handles the 4K TOS take a look at. Scoring 319 common FPS in comparison with the 157 FPS of the 4060.
Productiveness efficiency offers an attention-grabbing twist. In Blender, the RTX 4060 constantly outperforms the Arc B580, demonstrating its energy in 3D rendering duties. Conversely, the Arc B580’s sturdy H.265 {hardware} acceleration permits it to encode 4K video practically twice as quick because the RTX 4060, making it a compelling alternative for content material creators targeted on video workflows.
The Arc B580 is a succesful GPU, significantly in memory-heavy situations, ray tracing, and video encoding duties. Nevertheless, the RTX 4060 holds its floor with higher assist in 3D workloads like Blender.
The Arc B580’s bigger 12GB VRAM could also be extra interesting when prioritising greater resolutions or ray tracing. On the similar time, for those who’re on the lookout for smoother efficiency in well-optimized titles or 3D rendering, you might gravitate towards the RTX 4060. Each playing cards supply distinctive strengths, leaving the ultimate alternative depending on particular person use instances and software program priorities.
A better have a look at the Xe2 Battlemage structure
Intel’s Xe2 Battlemage structure powers the Arc B580, marking the corporate’s second technology of discrete gaming GPUs. Positioned because the mid-range successor to the Arc A580 “Alchemist,” the B580 is constructed on the brand new BMG-G21 silicon and represents a refined leap in gaming GPU know-how.
The Arc B580 leverages the TSMC N5 (5 nm EUV) course of node, packing a powerful 19.6 billion transistors right into a 272 mm² die. Whereas its configuration doesn’t maximise the silicon’s capabilities, it completely aligns with the mid-range gaming GPU market, balancing energy and effectivity. The chip contains a PCIe 4.0 x8 host interface and a 192-bit GDDR6 reminiscence bus, paired with an 18 MB last-level cache to assist its 5 Render Slices.
Every Render Slice processes geometry, rasterization, and rendering duties, linked by way of an inside cloth and reminiscence subsystem. This modernized format competes with Nvidia’s Ada Lovelace and AMD’s RDNA 3 architectures, all of which use the 5nm node.
Media and Show Improvements
Past uncooked efficiency, the Xe2 Battlemage structure enhances media and show capabilities. The Arc B580 consists of two multi-format encoders and decoders, making it adept at dealing with video workloads. The Show Engine helps 4 outputs, catering to varied high-resolution and high-refresh-rate monitor setups.
Software program Ecosystem and Latency Reductions
Intel pairs its {hardware} improvements with a revamped software program suite. The “Intel Graphics Software program” replaces the Arc Management utility, providing streamlined overclocking instruments, driver-based latency optimizations, and integration with XeSS 2 applied sciences like Body Era and Low Latency (XeLL). These developments underscore Intel’s dedication to bettering each efficiency and person expertise.
With the Xe2 Battlemage structure, the Arc B580 strikes a compelling stability between worth and efficiency. The design choices, such because the 192-bit reminiscence bus and superior render pipeline, make it a powerful alternative for mid-range avid gamers looking for fashionable options like ray tracing and AI-enhanced upscaling. Intel’s targeted efforts on effectivity, media processing, and low-latency gameplay might give it an edge in a crowded GPU market.
