Energy, Efficiency, and Worth The Intel Core i7-13700K Delivers It All.
Up to date: Dec 3, 2024 4:18 pm
WePC is reader-supported. While you purchase by means of hyperlinks on our website, we might earn an affiliate fee. Costs topic to alter. Be taught extra
The Core i7-13700K is one in all Intel’s middle-ground processors and sits in a clumsy market (although it was as soon as thought-about the most effective CPU for worth). Many agree that the 14th era wasn’t value the additional cash over the thirteenth era as a result of not an excessive amount of modified (apart from the added E-cores within the 14700K), furthering the viability of the thirteenth era after the refresh – particularly if you wish to avoid wasting cash.
We predict the 13700K is commonly neglected as a result of it sits beside two well-liked chips (the 13600K and the 13900K), the previous for effectivity and cost-effectiveness and the latter for uncooked efficiency. The thirteenth era additionally took place when Intel began dominating single and multi-threaded duties, making the 13700K a stranger choice as a result of in case you needed uncooked efficiency, you simply opted for the 13900K.
So, how does the 13700K evaluate to as we speak’s CPUs, particularly the brand new Core Extremely 200 collection?
Specs
- Cores: 16
- Threads: 24
- Base pace: P-cores 3.4 GHz / E-cores 2.5 GHz
- Increase pace: P-cores 5.4 GHz / E-cores 4.2 GHz
- Cache: 24MB
- TDP: 125 W / 253 W increase.
What We Assume
The Intel Core i7-13700K affords distinctive efficiency at a pretty value level. It delivers clean gaming experiences, environment friendly multitasking, and powerful total processing energy, making it a stable alternative for each avid gamers and creators alike. Its steadiness of value and efficiency makes it a standout in its class, particularly for customers who need reliability with out overspending. Nonetheless, it has been outmoded by the Core Extremely 265K in case you care concerning the very newest effectivity performs.
Causes to Purchase
- Robust single-core and multi-core efficiency
- Wonderful worth for cash
- Nice for gaming and productiveness duties
Causes to Keep away from
- Very excessive energy consumption in comparison with later fashions
- Lacks among the cutting-edge options of newer chips
- Efficiency might be overkill for informal customers
Specs and comparability
Right here, we evaluate the specs of the 13700K to these of the 14900K to see what has modified generationally. We will additionally briefly look at the 265K, the (XX700K alternative).
| Part | Core i7-13700K | Core i7-14700K | Core Extremely 265K |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cores | 16 | 20 | 20 |
| Core Config | 8P+8E | 8P+12E | 8P+12E |
| Threads | 24 | 28 | 20 |
| Base frequency | P-core 3.4 GHz / E-core 2.5 GHz | P-core 3.4 GHz / E-core 2.5 GHz | P-core 3.9 GHz / E-core 3.3 GHz |
| Increase frequency | P-core 5.4 GHz / E-core 4.2 GHz | P-core 5.6 GHz / E-core 4.3 GHz | P-core 5.5 GHz / E-core 4.6 GHz |
| Increase 3.0 | 5.4 GHz | 5.6 GHz | N/A |
| Reminiscence pace | 5600 MT/s | 5600 MT/s | 6400 MT/s |
| PCI Categorical lanes | 20 (Gen 5) | 16 (Gen 5) | 20 (Gen 5) |
| L2 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) | 112 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 30 MB (shared) | 33 MB (shared) | 30 MB (shared) |
| TDP / PL1 / PL2 | 125W / 253W / 253W | 125W / 253W / 253W | 125W / 250W / 250W |
| Course of dimension | 10 nm | 10 nm | 3 nm |
| Socket | LGA 1700 (suitable with H610, B660, H670, Q670, Z690, W680, B760, H770, Z790) | LGA 1700 (suitable with H610, B660, H670, Q670, Z690, W680, B760, H770, Z790) | LGA 1851 (suitable with Z890) |
Efficiency
Earlier than stepping into the nitty-gritty, we have to define the parts in our check bench. We do that to advertise transparency and to point out you that your outcomes will differ from ours in case you use completely different {hardware}. Realizing how the CPU performs in ours can also be an effective way to gauge how nicely it might carry out in your system.
Earlier
Subsequent
| Part | WePC check rig |
|---|---|
| CPU | Core i7-13700K |
| Cooler | Corsair H150i Elite LCD |
| Motherboard | ASUS Z790 Darkish Hero |
| Reminiscence | Corsair Dominator Platinum DDR5 @6800 MHz |
| GPU | MSI RTX 4070 Ti |
| PSU | ASUS Thor Platinum II 1000W |
| Case | Cooler Grasp Masterframe |
As we are able to see, we spare no expense when testing CPUs to make sure we extract probably the most efficiency attainable. We additionally like to match parts, even when testing throughout completely different manufacturers and generations. This produces comparable outcomes and helps us offer you info that truly helps.
Gaming Efficiency
| Metric | CS2 | Days Gone | CP 2077 | Doom Everlasting | Horizon FW |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rating (FPS) | AVG: 318 99%: 173.33 |
AVG: 245.07 99%: 154.54 |
AVG: 221.98 99%: 164.81 |
AVG: 447.30 99%: 329.95 |
AVG: 184.32 99%: 134.07 |
| AVG temp (bundle) °C | 54 | 54 | 63 | 58 | 63 |
| Max temp (bundle) °C | 69 | 67 | 70 | 65 | 70 |
| Common PPT (W) | 99.22W | 98.88W | 134.74W | 119.84W | 118.95W |
The Intel Core i7-13700K is a succesful gaming processor that delivers spectacular outcomes throughout varied titles. Counter-Strike 2’s common body price of 318 FPS ensures distinctive fluidity, whereas the 99th percentile rating of 173.33 FPS highlights constant efficiency even in demanding moments. This degree of responsiveness is treasured for aggressive avid gamers.
For open-world titles like Days Gone, the CPU hits a median of 245.07 FPS. This outcome displays clean gameplay with minimal stutter, even in areas with many environmental particulars. Equally, Cyberpunk 2077, recognized for its heavy reliance on CPU and GPU, sees the 13700K delivering a median of 221.98 FPS with a secure 99th percentile of 164.81 FPS. That is glorious for such a demanding sport, making it excellent for high-refresh-rate gaming even in graphically intensive situations.
Thermals stay well-controlled all through testing, with common bundle temperatures hovering between 54°C and 63°C, relying on the sport. Even underneath heavier masses, the utmost temperatures peak at a fairly manageable 70°C (though you’ll need a 360mm AIO cooler for these outcomes). Energy draw varies by workload, staying environment friendly at round 99W for lighter video games like CS2 however reaching 134W in titles like Cyberpunk 2077. These figures are in keeping with expectations for a high-performance chip just like the 13700K.
Comparability
| CPU | CS2 | Days Gone | Doom Everlasting | Horizon FW |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Core i7-13700K | AVG: 318 99%: 173.33 |
AVG: 245.07 99%: 15.54 |
AVG: 447.30 99%: 329.95 |
AVG: 184.32 99%: 134.07 |
| Core Extremely 7 265K | AVG: 309.7 99%: 130.9 |
AVG: 212.8 99%: 137.9 |
AVG: 495.7 99%: 347.8 |
AVG: 192.2 99%: 139.3 |
The Core i7-13700K faces robust competitors from its successor regardless of the drawbacks of the Core Extremely 7 265K, a part of Intel’s newest Arrow Lake lineup, which it does nicely. In Counter-Strike 2, the 13700K holds its floor with the next common FPS (318 vs. 309.7) and a considerably higher 99th percentile rating (173.33 vs. 130.9). For aggressive avid gamers, the 13700K nonetheless delivers smoother efficiency on this fast-paced shooter.
In Days Gone, the 13700K once more takes the lead with a median FPS of 245.07, comfortably outpacing the 265K’s 212.8. Its higher 99th percentile rating of 154.54 in comparison with 137.9 reveals its skill to take care of steadier efficiency throughout intense gameplay, making it higher suited to open-world adventures.
Nonetheless, Doom Everlasting tells a special story, with the 265K pushing forward due to a median FPS of 495.7 in comparison with the 13700K’s 447.3. Its stronger 99th percentile rating (347.8 vs. 329.95) means that the Arrow Lake structure brings noticeable enhancements in video games optimized for multi-core processing.
Regardless of the Core Extremely 7 265K positive factors, the 13700K stays a powerful performer, significantly in older or less-optimized titles the place its effectivity and stability shine. Whereas Arrow Lake represents the longer term, the 13700K nonetheless affords glorious worth and reliability for avid gamers as we speak.
Artificial benchmarks
| Metric | CPU Z | Cinebench R23 | Geekbench | Blender render |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rating (factors) | Single 865 Multi 12,486 |
Single 2079 Multi 30,120 |
Single 2,943 Multi 19,559 |
Monster: 179.91 SPM Junkshop: 129.43 SPM Classroom: 89.04 SPM |
| AVG temp (bundle) °C | 65 | Single: 54 Multi: 81 |
45 | 81 |
| Max temp (bundle) °C | 83 | Single: 62 Multi: 93 |
73 | 95 |
| Common PPT (W) | 108.29W | Single: 52.3W Multi: 192.18W |
46.84W | 186.67W |
The Intel Core i7-13700K delivers respectable ends in artificial benchmarks, showcasing its versatility throughout each single-core and multi-core workloads. In CPU-Z, it achieves 865 factors in single-core and 12,486 in multi-core, highlighting its steadiness of uncooked pace and parallel processing functionality. Cinebench R23 additional reinforces this, with 2,079 single-core factors and a formidable 30,120 in multi-core, demonstrating its skill to deal with demanding inventive workloads like rendering or heavy multitasking.
Geekbench follows the same pattern, with 2,943 in single-core and 19,559 in multi-core. This positions the 13700K as a stable performer for blended workloads, from gaming to productiveness. In Blender, its scene render instances break right down to 179.91 SPM (Monster), 129.43 SPM (Junkshop), and 89.04 SPM (Classroom), solidifying its power in 3D rendering duties.
Thermals and energy utilization are in keeping with expectations for a high-performance chip. Common bundle temperatures vary from 54°C in lighter single-core situations to 81°C underneath multi-core stress. Energy draw peaks at 192W throughout multi-threaded Cinebench duties, showcasing its skill to push efficiency boundaries whereas sustaining affordable effectivity. Once more, you’ll want a 360mm AIO for these temps.
These outcomes replicate a processor that excels throughout various artificial benchmarks, making the 13700K a superb alternative for avid gamers and creators who demand constant efficiency however don’t wish to spend an arm and a leg on a chip.
| CPU | Rating | AVG temp (bundle) °C | Max temp (bundle) °C | Common PPT (W) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Core i7-13700K | Single 2079 Multi 30,120 |
Single: 54 Multi: 81 |
Single: 62 Multi: 93 |
Single: 52.3W Multi: 192.18W |
| Core Extremely 7 265K | Single 2,037 Multi 33,429 |
Single: 48 Multi: 63 |
Single: 54 Multi: 69 |
Single: 55.52W Multi: 162.63W |
| Ryzen 7 7700X (PCGuide) | Single 1,995 Multi 19,650 |
N/A | N/A | N/A |
The Core i7-13700K continues to point out sturdy efficiency, significantly in single-threaded duties, the place its rating of two,079 edges out each the Core Extremely 7 265K (2,037) and Ryzen 7 7700X (1,995). This makes it a superb alternative for duties that depend on clock pace and responsiveness. Nonetheless, the Core Extremely 7 265K leads with 33,429 factors in multi-threaded workloads, outperforming the 13700K’s 30,120. The Ryzen 7 7700X falls considerably behind in multi-core efficiency at 19,650, reflecting its decrease core depend.
Thermals and energy effectivity spotlight some key variations. The 13700K runs hotter and attracts extra energy throughout multi-core workloads (81°C and 192W) in comparison with the 265K’s cooler 63°C and 162W. The 7700X lacks thermal and energy knowledge, however its multi-core efficiency suggests it’s much less aggressive than both Intel chip.
General, the 13700K balances excessive single-core efficiency and aggressive multi-core outcomes. Nonetheless, the Core Extremely 7 265K affords higher effectivity and multi-threaded efficiency, reflecting the developments in Arrow Lake structure. The Ryzen 7 7700X holds its personal in single-threaded duties however trails in multi-threaded workloads, making it much less versatile for heavy computational calls for.
Worth
When evaluating costs, the Intel Core i7-13700K affords the most effective worth at $273.47, delivering stable gaming and multi-core efficiency with out breaking the financial institution. It’s excellent in case you’re in search of stable efficiency with out spending an excessive amount of. The Core Extremely 7 265K, priced at $388.95, is a dearer choice that provides higher multi-core efficiency and cutting-edge expertise, making it a good selection in case you want the most recent structure for productiveness duties. Nonetheless, we wouldn’t advocate this chip for gaming alone.
The Ryzen 7 9700X sits at $320.00 and affords gaming and productiveness efficiency steadiness, making it a stable middle-ground alternative. The Ryzen 7 7700X at $264.95 is the closest competitor to the 13700K value, excelling in gaming however trailing in multi-core efficiency. Lastly, the Core i7-14700K at $347.00 is a powerful performer that sits between the 13700K and Core Extremely 265K, providing stable efficiency for extra demanding duties with out reaching the worth of the 265K. It’s as much as you to determine which processor most accurately fits your wants.
